A leader’s coping capacity—meaning the way they deal with pressure and uncertainty—drives value creation just as much as, if not more than, the quality of the strategic plan or the financial structure. It shapes their management style as well as their relationships with shareholders, when they have them.
Coping, you said?
In psychology, coping refers to the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural efforts a person deploys to handle a situation perceived as stressful. One generally distinguishes between problem-focused strategies and emotion-focused strategies, depending on the context and the resources perceived. Coping is dynamic: a strategy that is useful in the short term (for example, avoidance as a means of self-protection) can become costly if it prevents action or learning.
As a business grows, evolves, or underperforms, governance changes in nature: tighter reporting, explicit KPIs, board involvement in major projects, and a need for rapid alignment on the value-creation roadmap. In this context, the quality of the leadership team and its collective functioning—just like the quality of the CEO–CFO partnership and the architecture of the relationship with shareholders—becomes a major psychological buffer or, conversely, an amplifier of cognitive load for the leader.
In today’s climate of tension and uncertainty, our experience shows that beyond the ability to give direction and guide teams, the leaders who succeed are those who combine a problem-focused coping approach (structured management, data-driven decisions, clear prioritisation) with conscious emotional regulation (acceptance, reframing, social support) to preserve clarity and collective energy.
For a professional investor, it is possible—before a deal—to understand an individual’s preferred coping mechanisms through assessment tools and interviews focused on these topics. Understanding how the leadership team functions also helps anticipate how they will operate under pressure. By objectifying adaptation preferences, it becomes possible to initiate targeted work at both the individual and collective level. This is what we do at Selescope using our Myscope and Scopexec tools.
Coming back to coping: it is not a fixed trait but a capability that can be cultivated and developed… and like other capabilities, it is not shared equally among all leaders. When present, it allows pressure to be transformed into discernment and urgency into coherent action. When absent or underdeveloped, the quality of the relational fabric—the glue that holds together collective dynamics within the executive committee and governance bodies—can quickly deteriorate under pressure and uncertainty.
Getting to know oneself better in order to understand how to deal with pressure and uncertainty—individually and collectively—is a true performance driver, too often ignored or poorly assessed.
A bit of reading on the topic of coping :
- The Conversation, “Psychologie : le ‘coping’, ou comment nous faisons face aux stress intenses”
- Wikipédia, “Stratégie d’adaptation”.
- Harvard Business Review, “The Best Leaders Aren’t Afraid to Be Vulnerable”
[i] Myscope est un outil psychométrique fondé sur la psychologie différentielle. Il permet de mesurer les aptitudes cognitives (mémoire, logique, attention) et d’évaluer des traits de personnalité (émotions, comportements, motivation). Cet outils propriétaire a été validé par une équipe de chercheurs en psychologie.
[ii] Scopexec est un outil propriétaire qui permet un diagnostic complet des organisations, construit à partir de la psychologie sociale et de la sociologie des organisations.